Tuesday, June 3, 2008

How Do I Know If My Rook Is Infected

Notícia de Las Provincias publicada també a www.aielodemalferit.es

The Judge confirms that the former mayor of Aielo awards illegally plot her husband

The first authority means that "ethics" should return the benefits

The High Court of Valencia (TSJCV) has ratified the sentence of Administrative against ex Mayor Aiello of Malferit, Cristina Look for declaring void the award of a municipal lot to a company formed by her husband and their two young daughters, five months before the auction of the land.

The Board upholds the decision of Administrative pointing out that the municipal action is void where prohibited by administrative law transferred, municipal property a legal entity run by the wives and daughters of the mayor, in breach of an explicit prohibition and the rules of free competition, equality, protection of public interest, without prejudice to other moral considerations ", as stated in the sentence verbatim the TSJCV.

The events date back to 2004, so that parcel of land is currently occupied by an apartment building.

The current mayor of the PP, José Luis Juan pointed to the provinces that required "implementation sentence and is the current Corporation will ask the former socialist mayor returned to City Hall the advantage enjoyed by the company her husband with the construction and sale of apartments.

The first authority added that it is an issue to deal with municipal legal services but "in any case, it is a moral and ethical obligation to restore that money because it was obtained in a illegal. "

The ruling upholds the sentence of Administrative very blunt in pointing out that the appeal filed at the time by Cristina Mira lacks legitimacy, as to" the clarity of the standards, hard to understand a resource appeal as the present one. "The same text says that" this is not the appropriate framework to discuss morality or ethics in the management of public interests, but the appeal leads inexorably to it. "

In this situation, the Board considers the costs imposed on the former mayor" by the apparent recklessness and bad faith action, despite the clarity of his "lack of law and against a statement that emphasized strict so arbitrary and unwarranted action at local level ", according to estimates by the judge.

The PP appealed at the time the agreement of Parliament that approved the award of that plot. Jose Luis Juan recalled that the Group Socialist "did nothing to enable and support the award by voting," but emphasized that this fact led to differences within the party that resulted in the resignation of the then first deputy mayor, Juan Rafael Espí.

The ruling also highlights, to the doubt raised about the validity of contract for the sale of a property company with Mira's husband and daughters, the mayor declared the day after the plenary to issue a favorable report on the award, whose issue was made "anonymously, without stating the author and municipal office of the user, or the signer's identity," said the statement.

also concludes that the former mayor abstaining from voting for the same alleged on appeal, "was more than required and did not stop an operation legally prohibited "CLOSING FAILURE.
Source: Las Provincias (03/30/2008)


agree that published this news, but we can describe as partisan as the Web www.aielodemalferit . there is no trace of the news of the trial Tere or compensation that they now face the PP Aielo.

0 comments:

Post a Comment