The conviction four civil guards tortured, proves there is no full impunity. And that allegations of Amnesty International are based despite attempts to discredit . In this case no longer invoke both the state of law. Rather than terrorism anything goes, and has an important social support. Do not see that is placed at the level of violence of those who placed an explosive device, the difference is the use of violence or rejection.
Interestingly, not given as proof that lies being ETA. Contrary to the idea that the charge of torture is part of guidelines for the band. Not everything goes against terrorism.
The Association for Civil Guard lost a good opportunity to distance themselves from violence and the d black elements of your organization . Then they complain about the homage to ETA . Expressing its full support to defendants. And awkward has been saying that the judge in Guipuzcoa played in the attacking half. Putting the other side is doubting the justice of judgments against ETA when trials have been in Madrid.
Interestingly, not given as proof that lies being ETA. Contrary to the idea that the charge of torture is part of guidelines for the band. Not everything goes against terrorism.
The Association for Civil Guard lost a good opportunity to distance themselves from violence and the d black elements of your organization . Then they complain about the homage to ETA . Expressing its full support to defendants. And awkward has been saying that the judge in Guipuzcoa played in the attacking half. Putting the other side is doubting the justice of judgments against ETA when trials have been in Madrid.
0 comments:
Post a Comment